"You've walked longer than I've driven, figure it out..."

WASHINGTON D.C.—A new law has stirred controversy by revoking pedestrians' right of way if they signal for cars to proceed but then try to cross the street anyway. The law, aimed at reducing confusion and accidents at crosswalks, has sparked mixed reactions from both pedestrians and drivers.

Proponents argue that the law promotes clear communication between pedestrians and drivers, preventing potentially dangerous misunderstandings. "It's about time. I'm tired of all the back and forth. They never know If they are going or staying. You've walked longer than I've driven, figure it out," says traffic safety advocate Sarah Johnson.

However, critics contend that the law unfairly penalizes pedestrians for simple mistakes and places too much responsibility on them to ensure their own safety. "It's unreasonable to expect pedestrians to always make perfect decisions in chaotic traffic situations, the drivers in the 2-ton death machines should have those expectations" argues pedestrian rights activist David Chen.

The new law highlights the ongoing debate over the balance of responsibility between pedestrians and drivers in ensuring road safety. While some believe it provides much-needed clarity, others argue it could lead to increased tension and confusion at crosswalks. As the law takes effect, its impact on road safety and public perception remains to be seen.